by: Alyssa del Rosario
There are positive
and negative affects when it comes to fashion copying/knock-offs. Well- known retailers, such as Zara, Forever
21, H&M, have the authority to profit from other designers. In reference to my personal experience, I
have been to Zara for a few times and I have noticed a lot of knock-offs in
their stores. I oftentimes wonder why
the original designer is not taking action on this situation. At the same time, I though about how this
will benefit people that can afford this.
Fashion is an everyday thing where many influencers are everywhere. Although, this seems wrong in different ways,
this can also benefit others.
Look-alikes in retail stores are being sold for a much cheaper price,
which can help people afford clothing styles that celebrities wore. In an article, “The Copycat Economy,” written
by Helena Pike, she stated, “The fact that near-identical copies of luxury
fashion designs are available on the high street dilutes luxury labels’’ brand
equity and makes their products less desirable.” She is implying that customers are more drawn
and tempted to by a particular clothing choice at a much cheaper price. In this case, there is a negative effect that
pertains to this. Loss of sales affects
the designer due to the knock-offs of different clothing styles. “When the design is copied, it signals to the
market that this is going to be a trend, and even more copies are produced.”
(Pike) Sometimes customers would buy
particular clothing because they see it as a necessity. Majority of the time, customers are more
beneficial in the fashion industry because designers learn along the way to
understand what is needed or not needed.
There are many different kinds of retail stores that would
copy and make look-alikes to sell to customers.
I decided to narrow down my focus to Urban Outfitters. Although I did not shop there before, I have
read and heard stories about how they would take stolen products to make it
their own. Urban Outfitters is a popular
trendy store that attracts different types of customers. They are known for ripping off famous
designers for their works to use as “inspirations.” In an article, “Urban Outfitters Continues
Their Grand Tradition Of Ripping Off Designers,” written by Jason Linkins, he
states, “The bad news is retailers like Urban Outfitters are straight up
stealing the fruits of their labor.”
Following this quote, there was a story on this article discussing how
Urban Outfitters stole an idea off a jewelry designer that created a pendant
with the state of New York and its heart that is cut out. In reference from the same article,
“Koerner’s pendant is called” I Heart New York,” and Urban Outfitters line is
called “I Heart Destination Neclaces.” (Linkins) Urban Outfitters has copied many other
businesses, whether they are big or small, the retail stores find a way to
redesign the whole concept that was created by the designer. This type of business shows that it is a
“normal” thing to do when different retail stores would follow the same rule
that copying is a “good thing.”

Stay
tuned for the next blog post, where I will be discussing Patent Protection and
Copyright!!😄
Works
Cited:
Linkins,
Jason. “Urban Outfitters Continues Their Grand Tradition Of Ripping Off
Designers.” Huffington
Post, HuffPost, 26 May 2011,
Pike,
Helena. “The Copycat Economy.” The Business of Fashion, 14 Mar. 2016,
Picture:
Alyssa's main purpose for this article is to expose the reality of capitalism and how that functions in the fashion industry. Alyssa uses her sources to reinforce the point that many business steal looks and still make profit. If Alyssa chose to revise this, I'd advise her to focus on making an argument of her own in addition to just stating the problem. Don't you think its kind of a good thing that stores steal looks? They make it possible so that the expensive pieces are accessible to poor people like me :)
ReplyDelete